Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized architecture-decision body: dense, concrete guidance (exact rules, named tools, a decision table with defaults, explicit anti-patterns) with a clear 7-step workflow and one genuine validation checkpoint with error recovery. The main costs are structural repetition of the skill-boundary meta-explanation, scattered repeated pointers to the single external guide, and the absence of any reference code inside the body itself.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'esta skill decide a arquitetura, as skills de domínio implementam' boundary — currently restated in Governanca, Quando Nao Usar, Responsabilidade 7, Handoff, and Integracao — into one canonical statement and drop the repetitions.
Gather the 8+ scattered pointers to docs/skill-guides/app-reference-architecture.md into a single 'Guia de referência' section mapping each topic (Auth, Build Tauri, Pagamentos, Push, Docker/CI-CD, Guia de Decisão) to its guide section, citing it once per Responsabilidade at most.
Add a small inline skeleton for the highest-risk artifact (the Tauri build swap/restore script's finally block) so the core pattern is executable from the body, since the referenced guide file is not part of this skill bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense decision content throughout with zero concept-explanation padding — it never explains what Next.js, Docker, webhooks, or VAPID are, and assumes Claude's competence. Noticeable structural repetition keeps it from anchor 5: the 'esta skill decide, as outras implementam' boundary is restated ~5 times (Governanca, Quando Nao Usar, Responsabilidade 7, Handoff, Integracao) and the guide path is pointed to 8+ times. Clearly above anchor 3, which would require unnecessary explanation rather than intentional-but-trimmable signposting. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete named guidance: 'renomeia, nunca deleta... restaura tudo no finally', a single Subscription table with the exact status values (active/trialing/grace_period/canceled/past_due/account_hold), 'cron de reconciliação diário' for RTDN, r0adkll/upload-google-play@v1, and exact output files (next.config.tauri.mjs, scripts/build-tauri.js, .github/workflows/android-release.yml). Not anchor 5: the actual reference code for every piece is deferred to the external guide, so the body itself has minor gaps an implementer must leave to fetch. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence (classify app type → auth → Tauri build → payment → push → Docker/CI → register decision + handoff) with one explicit validation checkpoint and error-recovery loop ('Checkpoint: rodar o build Tauri de verdade... Se o build falhar, checar primeiro se o finally rodou') plus a completion checklist (Evidencia de Conclusao). Anchor 4 rather than 5 because validation exists only for the Tauri build step; the other decisions (e.g., payment webhook, push delivery) lack equivalent checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good one-level-deep reference pattern — each section names exactly which guide section holds the detail ('Ver seção "3. Pagamentos" no guia para schema completo, webhook idempotente'). Not anchor 5: the referenced docs/skill-guides/app-reference-architecture.md is not present in this skill bundle (no references/ directory, so the pointer is unverifiable), the pointer is repeated 8+ times instead of consolidated, and sibling references (GLOBAL.md, policies/*.md) are likewise external. Above anchor 3, since references are clearly signaled with their content described rather than buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |