Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes competence — no concept explanations, no filler — with every section carrying operational content (find/grep commands, a filled-in template, hex-coded examples). It falls short of the 'every token earns its place' anchor because sections overlap: 'Saidas Esperadas', 'Formato do inventario', and 'Evidencia de Conclusao' each restate the inventory/gaps deliverable, and 'Quando Usar' duplicates the frontmatter triggers. Well above a 3 — the padding is redundancy, not over-explanation.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: copy-paste find/grep commands for every asset class, a complete markdown output template with example rows (real hex codes, dimensions, paths), and six concrete consistency checks with specific remediation actions. Matches the 'copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases' anchor; not a 4 since there are no gaps in the core discovery-to-report flow.

Workflow Clarity

The flow (discover via commands -> write inventory to docs/repo-audit/assets.md -> run consistency checks -> evidence -> handoffs) is legible and the destructive operation gets a genuine validation checkpoint: "checkpoint antes de apagar: grep pelo nome sem extensao tambem... So remover apos os dois greps confirmarem zero referencia" — a validate-before-delete feedback loop that avoids the batch/destruction cap. Not a 5 because the sequence is implied by section order rather than an explicit ordered procedure, and there is no retry/verification loop after the inventory is written.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well-sectioned and self-contained at ~118 lines, with the heavy material (output template, checks) appropriately inline for its size. It stops at 4 rather than 5 because it points to files outside the bundle that a reader cannot navigate to from here — 'policies/execution.md', 'templates/asset-inventory.md' ("quando util") — which are referenced but not present, and the full inventory template is borderline content that a larger skill would split into references/.

Specificity

Enumerates concrete object types ("imagens, icones, logos, fontes, tokens visuais e referencias graficas") and two concrete actions ("inventariar e organizar"), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not a 5 because the action verbs are limited to inventory/organize/map — it omits concrete capabilities the body delivers, such as conflict/duplicate detection and obsolete-asset hunting.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ("inventariar e organizar imagens, icones, logos, fontes, tokens visuais...") and when ("Use quando precisar mapear assets existentes, evitar inconsistencias visuais e apoiar UI/UX, Frontend e Image Generator") plus a concrete trigger list. Matches the top anchor; not a 4 because the 'when' is explicit and specific rather than merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list gives broad natural-phrase synonym coverage: "inventariar assets", "inventario de assets", "mapear assets", "organizar assets", "auditar assets visuais", "catalogar logos", "biblioteca de assets", "design tokens", "incoerencia visual" — these are exactly what a user would say. Fits the 'comprehensive coverage including synonyms' anchor; not a 4 since only niche synonyms (e.g. "paleta", "favicon") are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (visual asset inventory) with mostly distinct triggers, but "auditar assets visuais" and "design tokens" carry minor overlap risk with a general repo-auditor skill and a frontend theming skill respectively — matching 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk'. Not a 5 given the sibling-skill ecosystem implies nearby auditors/theming skills; well above a 3 since the scope is unmistakably visual-asset-specific.