Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly structured, highly actionable protocol with concrete Playwright MCP calls, a decision tree, and explicit validation checkpoints. It is concise and well-navigable, with only minor redundancy between its checkpoint and completion checklist.
Suggestions
Merge or cross-link the inline "Checkpoint" (Protocolo step) and "Evidência de Conclusão" checklist to remove overlapping result-verification guidance and tighten the token budget.
Move the viewport table and "Anti-padrões" table into a short reference section or file so the core protocol reads as a lean overview with one-level-deep detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — compact tables, short protocol steps, no concept explanations of Playwright or screenshots — but the "Checkpoint" and "Evidência de Conclusão" sections partly overlap on result verification, leaving minor instances that could be trimmed rather than a fully frictionless token budget. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: real MCP tool calls (browser_resize, browser_navigate, browser_evaluate, browser_take_screenshot) with concrete arguments, an exact viewport table, a cookie-banner removal snippet, and a naming convention — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1–7 protocol is sequenced with an explicit "Checkpoint" feedback loop ("ajustar o passo correspondente ... e capturar de novo") plus a completion checklist, satisfying the anchor for explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops; validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a one-level-deep "Cross-references" section (skill 41, skill 17, GLOBAL.md, policies/tool-safety.md), and no bundle files exist to mis-split; it stops short of the 5 anchor only because all reference material is inline rather than split into separate files, which is acceptable for this scope. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |