Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction skill with an exemplary explicit checkpoint and validation checklist, precise input/output contracts, and clear anti-pattern guidance. Its main gaps are the absence of a worked example for the JSON artifact it mandates and recovery guidance attached to the completion-evidence checklist.
Suggestions
Add a compact worked example of one shotIntents[] entry (or a minimal CreativeDirectionArtifact snippet) so the enumerated field list becomes unambiguous in practice, lifting actionability to fully executable.
Attach an explicit recovery loop to the Evidência de Conclusão checklist (e.g., 'if any check fails, fix the artifact and re-verify before handoff') mirroring the existing keyframe checkpoint pattern.
State where GLOBAL.md and policies/*.md live (bundle-relative or ecosystem root), or move the creative-direction.v1 field enumerations into a small schema reference file, so the skill's file references are verifiable within its own structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | ~90 dense lines with zero filler: no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, no padded sections, and competence is assumed throughout (a shot list or continuity bible is never defined). Every section — governance, quando usar/não usar, entradas, saídas, responsabilidades, anti-padrões, evidência, handoff, pipeline — carries distinct operational weight. The 'Fontes' section (2 lines) is marginally trimmable but negligible. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instruction-only guidance: exact input artifacts (ResearchStrategyArtifact, CopyDeckArtifact), an exact output contract (CreativeDirectionArtifact JSON, schemaVersion creative-direction.v1, with enumerated visualBible and shotIntents fields), six numbered responsibilities, and explicit routing to skills 70/71/17/12. It falls short of fully executable because there is no worked example of a shotIntent or a compact sample artifact, and field enumerations (e.g., "estilo, personagem, figurino, local, produto, paleta, câmera, luz…") lack definitions or value constraints beyond referenceRoles' identity/language. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is legible through document order (Entradas → Responsabilidades 1-6 → Saídas → Evidência → Handoff) and includes an explicitly labeled **Checkpoint** with a full feedback loop (compare first frame to approved keyframe → adjust prompt → regenerate) plus a completion checklist. Minor gaps remain: the numbered Responsabilidades are framed as decisions/principles rather than an ordered execution path, and the Evidência de Conclusão checklist has no fix-and-reverify recovery loop attached to it (not a destructive/batch operation, so the cap of 3 does not apply). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file skill: clear section headers, no bulk content inlined that belongs in separate files, and one-level-deep governance references (GLOBAL.md, policies/source-driven.md, policies/evals.md, policies/handoffs.md, policies/tool-safety.md) clearly signaled in a dedicated section. Minor gaps: those referenced policy files are not part of this skill's bundle (no references/ directory exists), and the artifact schema field lists are inlined rather than split into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |