Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted, highly actionable skill that provides clear multi-phase workflows with explicit validation checkpoints and concrete decision tables. Its main weakness is length — at ~250 lines with some redundancy, it could benefit from splitting detailed reference tables (interview patterns, audit checklist) into separate files. The dual-mode operation (generate vs audit) is well-designed with automatic detection logic and clear output formats for each mode.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the detailed interview pattern table and audit checklist into separate reference files (e.g., `references/interview-patterns.md` and `references/audit-checklist.md`) to reduce the main SKILL.md length and improve progressive disclosure.
Remove or consolidate the 'Quando Usar/Quando Nao Usar' sections — some items are obvious (e.g., 'em scaffolds vazios sem codigo') and Claude can infer these constraints from context.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly long (~250 lines) with some redundancy between sections (e.g., the section listing table appears twice in slightly different forms, and the 'Quando Usar/Nao Usar' sections contain some obvious statements). However, most content is specific and non-trivial — the audit checklist, interview patterns, and mode detection logic all earn their tokens. Some tightening is possible but it's not egregiously verbose. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete, actionable guidance: specific file paths to read, exact classification categories (inferida/parcial/desconhecida), a detailed interview pattern table with exact question templates per section and state, a concrete audit checklist with specific checks and actions, mode detection rules with age thresholds, and a clear output template. Commands and paths are specific and copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-phase workflow (Ingestão → Entrevista → Geração → Review → Escrita) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: prerequisite fallback if audit is missing, dev approval loop in Phase 4, diff confirmation before overwriting existing files, and the audit mode has its own structured checklist with pass/fail actions. The feedback loop (iterate until dev approves) is explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references several external files (GLOBAL.md, policies/*, templates/claude-md-output.md, docs/repo-audit/current.md) which is good progressive disclosure design. However, no bundle files were provided, so we can't verify these references resolve. The SKILL.md itself is monolithic — the audit mode content, interview patterns, and generation rules could potentially be split into separate reference files given the length. The content is well-structured with clear headers but everything is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |