Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An unusually disciplined skill body: a sequenced 5-step pipeline with real validation loops, decision tables instead of prose, and dense detail correctly pushed to one-level-deep references. The two real defects are the missing engine/ runtime files — which the build step instructs the agent to copy and PROVENANCE claims were 'copiado byte a byte' — and light redundancy in the taste rhetoric.
Suggestions
Ship the missing `engine/scrollcraft.js` and `engine/scrollcraft.css` in the bundle (or inline a minimal fallback in SKILL.md), since Passo 4 and the Saidas Esperadas both depend on copying them and PROVENANCE.md claims they were copied byte a byte — an agent following the skill will currently fail at the build step.
Deduplicate the filmic one-shot rule (stated at the end of the grammars section and again in Regras Duras) and trim the editorial asides in 'O que isto NAO e' to reclaim tokens without losing the taste guidance.
Surface `references/verify.md` and `references/taste.md` from the body's own Checagem/Saidas sections (not only via PROVENANCE) so the verification procedure and taste floor are discoverable from the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — no explanations of what scroll or libraries are, decision tables instead of prose, and detail explicitly deferred ('Conteudo denso... vive em `references/` — carregar sob demanda'), matching 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed'. Not 5: the filmic one-shot onus is stated twice (end of the grammars section and again as a Regras Duras row), and 'O que isto NAO e' carries some editorial rhetoric ('se reconhece de longe: mesmo diorama de argila...') that could be tightened without losing the taste guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable for an instruction-only skill: the 8-grammar table, the 'Nunca | Em vez isso' hard-rules table, a measurable pre-build checklist (4+ device families, max two scrub acts, 8-14 viewport-heights), the `data-sc-*`/`--sc-p` contract with real HTML in references/devices.md, and a concrete token-theming CSS block in pipeline.md. Not 5: the central copy-paste artifact — 'engine/scrollcraft.js e engine/scrollcraft.css (do diretorio raiz desta skill)' — does not exist in the bundle, so the build step's key executable cannot actually be executed as written. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-passo pipeline is clearly sequenced (entrevista → brief/jornada → gramatica/gate/score → assets → construir/verificar) with a pre-build checklist and an explicit validation feedback loop at Passo 5 ('voltar ao Passo 2 pra reclassificar o beat — nao corrigir o HTML isolado'), plus an evidence-of-completion list — matching the anchor's 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops; checklists'. Not 4: validation checkpoints are explicit and the recovery path names where to go back to, not merely 'verify output'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~200-line overview is well split across nine real, one-level-deep reference files, each signaled with what it holds and when to load it ('Detalhe completo... em `references/pipeline.md`', 'Ver references/worlds.md'), matching 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'. Not 5: scored against the actual bundle, the repeatedly referenced `engine/` directory is missing, `references/verify.md` and `references/taste.md` are surfaced only via PROVENANCE/pipeline.md rather than from the body's own verification sections, and GLOBAL.md/policies/ paths are unverifiable in this bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |