Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, actionable, intelligent-merge workflow with sensible guardrails and good token efficiency. Its main weaknesses are the absence of a validation/verification checkpoint before success and a monolithic structure that inlines reference material instead of splitting it out.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before the summary (e.g., re-read each modified main spec to confirm structure is intact and requirements are well-formed), turning the workflow into a validate-fix-retry loop.
Extract the "Delta Spec Format Reference" block and the "Output On Success" template into separate reference files (e.g., references/delta-format.md) and link to them, improving progressive disclosure and token budget.
Clarify the RENAMED step's execution detail, e.g., note how to handle a rename when the FROM requirement is not found in the main spec.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, assuming Claude's competence and avoiding concept re-explanation, but sections like the full "Delta Spec Format Reference" example and some restated guidance (e.g., repeating ADDED/MODIFIED handling in the reference) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is present throughout ("Run `openspec list --json`", explicit file paths like `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/*/spec.md`, clear per-case merge rules), but it is instruction-style rather than copy-paste code, and the RENAMED FROM:/TO: handling leaves minor execution detail implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (prompt selection → find deltas → apply per capability → summary) is laid out with explicit guardrails (read both specs first, preserve untouched content, ask when unclear, idempotent), but there is no validation checkpoint verifying the merged main spec is well-formed before declaring success, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well sectioned within a single file, but it is a monolithic ~100-line SKILL.md with no bundle files; the inlined Delta Spec Format Reference and example output block are content that could live in separate reference files, and there are no one-level-deep references to offload detail. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |