Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-organized, but the command-authoring workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint, e.g. after editing custom.rs run `cargo build` and only proceed to running the command once it compiles, with guidance on interpreting common errors.
Flesh out the "Available SDK Clients" stub, which currently promises a list but only states sub-clients are derived at generation time.
Add a short "if the SDK surface changed after regeneration" feedback step to the Regeneration Safety section to close the error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it skips generic explanations and every section (architecture file map, code patterns, regeneration table, build commands) earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable Rust (register(), super::sdk::client(ctx), block_on(...)) and real shell commands (cargo build, RUST_LOG=debug), matching the copy-paste-ready anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced (edit custom.rs → use SDK patterns → build & test) but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops within the workflow, only an end-of-flow build/test, fitting the sequence-present-but-checkpoints-implicit anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the self-contained body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Overview, Architecture, Adding a Custom Command, Regeneration Safety, Build & Test) with easy navigation and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |