Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: every section adds non-obvious guidance with no padding, and the tool contract (parameters and return fields) is spelled out. The main gaps are a missing example tool invocation and an explicit verification checkpoint after generation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence throughout — no concept explanations, no padding, and every line carries non-obvious domain guidance (e.g. 'Set output_path as a path prefix, not a final filename'; 'If the SMILES is chemically wrong, the generated structure will still be wrong'), matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, mostly executable guidance: names the tool, its fmt options, box_padding semantics, and the exact return fields (formula, natoms, xyz_file_rel, poscar_file_rel, box_size). Falls short of 5 only because no example invocation with actual arguments is shown; well above 3 since nothing is pseudocode or vague. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (normalize chemistry → generate one file per species → use returned paths as handoff contract) with a pre-flight check and an Output Contract that surfaces unresolved assumptions, but no explicit post-generation verification step, fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps' rather than the explicit feedback-loop anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is cleanly organized into Overview, Quick Start, Suggested tools, Workflow, Output Contract, and References sections, so the simple-skill exception applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |