Use this skill when the user asks for papers, prior work, literature support, benchmark conventions, or other explicit evidence grounding from published work.
54
61%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/literature-grounding/SKILL.mdUse this skill to decide when a request needs literature grounding and what depth of literature research is appropriate.
run_literature_research.run_literature_research, keep query as the literature question and provide a short domain phrase in topic when possible; scholarly databases should not receive the full reporting instruction text.depth=quick for representative-paper requests.depth=standard for method conventions, benchmark framing, or comparative evidence.depth=deep_report only for explicit deep-review or survey-style requests.Only trigger literature work when the user explicitly asks for papers, prior work, supporting evidence, benchmark context, or literature-grounded method conventions. Use normal web/online search first when the need is broad background, public-page summaries, or lightweight orientation rather than paper-level grounding.
Use quick for representative papers and fast grounding. Use standard for conventions, benchmark framing, or related-work summaries. Use focused when a narrow scientific question needs targeted evidence. Reserve deep_report for explicit deep-review requests.
Do not automatically hit both scholarly metadata APIs and public web in the same first pass. Start with public web when the request is broad, contextual, or public-summary-friendly. Use OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar when the user clearly needs paper-level grounding or when the web pass is too weak.
Use the returned literature context pack as the planning/evidence object. Do not surface the raw retrieval process, intermediate search noise, or browser-style exploration steps to the main agent context.
run_literature_research as a precise grounding path, not the default replacement for ordinary web search.Return a compact literature pack with a short summary, a small key-paper set, citations/links, confidence, and follow-up questions when uncertainty remains.
catalysis-prior-art-and-benchmarking when the literature task is specifically about heterogeneous-catalysis benchmarks or method conventions.c87fc76
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.