CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

claude-advanced-tool-use

Advanced tool use patterns including tool search, programmatic calling, and production orchestration. Use when scaling to 10,000+ tools, optimizing token usage, or implementing production tool systems.

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/claude-advanced-tool-use/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is claude-advanced-tool-use in fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body provides an executable quick start and a well-organized overview that correctly defers detail to four real, one-level-deep reference files. Its weaknesses are redundant when-to-use/bottleneck sections that repeat the same statistics multiple times, and one dead internal link.

Suggestions

Consolidate 'When to Use', 'The Compound Effect', and 'Performance Optimization -> Identifying Your Bottleneck' into a single section; they repeat the same criteria three times.

State the efficiency statistics (85-95%, 37%, 72%->90%) once in the Feature Comparison Matrix and remove the repetitions in the overview bullets and Compound Effect section.

Fix or remove the link to .analysis/research/codex-best-practices.md, which does not exist in the bundle; cite the source inline or point to an existing file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

'When to Use', 'The Compound Effect', and 'Performance Optimization -> Identifying Your Bottleneck' repeat largely the same criteria, and the efficiency statistics (85-95%, 37%, 72%->90%) appear three times. It is dense rather than padded, but the section-level redundancy means it could be tightened, matching anchor 3 rather than the minor-trim level of anchor 4.

3 / 5

Actionability

The Quick Start is copy-paste-ready with real beta header, model ID, and full tool schemas, matching 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. It is not anchor 5 because patterns like 'Planner + Executor' get only one-line descriptions with no inline code, and the body's link to .analysis/research/codex-best-practices.md is a dead path in the bundle.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

'Implementation Strategy' and 'What Happens' provide clear 5-6 step sequences plus an optimization checklist, but there are no error-recovery or feedback loops (e.g., what to do when tool_search returns no matches), matching anchor 4's 'most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than anchor 5's explicit validation steps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

All four references/*.md files exist, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled with descriptions in the References section, approaching anchor 5. However, the referenced path .analysis/research/codex-best-practices.md does not exist in the actual bundle, a real navigation gap that drops it to anchor 4.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that names its three concrete features and pairs them with an explicit, natural 'Use when...' trigger clause covering scale, cost, and production concerns. The main weaknesses are the slightly abstract 'production orchestration' phrasing and missing common trigger synonyms like 'MCP' or 'token costs'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific capabilities ('tool search, programmatic calling, and production orchestration') with minor gaps; 'production orchestration' is more abstract than the concrete verbs in the anchor-5 example, so it sits between anchors 4 and 5 but closer to 4.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the three named tool-use features) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use when scaling to 10,000+ tools, optimizing token usage, or implementing production tool systems' clause, matching anchor 5; anchor 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'scaling to 10,000+ tools' and 'optimizing token usage' are natural phrases users would say, but common variations like 'MCP', 'reduce token costs', or 'context bloat' are missing, matching anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named beta features (tool search, programmatic calling) carve a clear niche, but the trigger 'optimizing token usage' overlaps with closely related cost-optimization and context-management skills, keeping it at 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' rather than anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz

Path

.claude/skills/claude-advanced-tool-use/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.