codex-chat

Interactive REPL workflows with Codex CLI including session management, multimodal conversations, and automated execution. Use for extended development sessions, debugging, or collaborative problem-solving.

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/codex-chat/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with copy-paste bash examples and good section structure, but it loses conciseness to version-stamped asides and lacks the validation checkpoints that destructive automation workflows demand.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint for automation invocations (e.g. run tests or review the diff before committing) so destructive --dangerously-bypass sessions include a feedback loop.

Move the inline 'December 2025' version/date markers into a single deprecated/version-note section or remove them, to stop time-sensitive tokens from penalizing conciseness.

Extract the long Automation Patterns shell script into a references/ file and link to it, reducing repetition of the --dangerously-bypass invocation in the main body.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly code and reasonably tight, but inline time-sensitive markers ('Last Updated: December 2025', repeated '(December 2025)' comments) and redundant repetitions of the --dangerously-bypass flag across sections add tokens that do not earn their place.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste ready bash commands and a complete dev_session shell function covering the common invocation cases (models, images, web search, automation, session resume), giving Claude exact commands to run.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The skill centers on destructive/batch automation (--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox, --full-auto) yet includes no validation or verification checkpoints before or after execution, which caps workflow clarity per the rubric.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Quick Start, Session Management, Multimodal, Automation Patterns) with no nested references, though all material is inlined and the lengthy Automation Patterns script could live in a separate reference file.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-constructed: third person, concise, and covers both what the skill does and when to use it with concrete capability areas. Its main weakness is that the 'when' triggers are slightly abstract and could name more concrete, natural user phrases.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Use for ...' clause with concrete trigger phrasings users actually say (e.g. 'Use when the user wants to run an interactive Codex coding session, resume a previous session, or drive Codex hands-free').

Add a natural synonym or invocation-style keyword (e.g. 'pair programming', 'hands-free coding') to broaden trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Codex CLI REPL domain and several concrete capability areas ('session management, multimodal conversations, and automated execution'), but stops short of enumerating the full set of actions, leaving minor gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly states what the skill does (interactive REPL workflows with the listed capabilities) and gives an explicit 'Use for ...' trigger clause, but the 'when' phrasing ('collaborative problem-solving') is somewhat abstract rather than concretely triggered.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user-facing terms like 'debugging', 'extended development sessions', and 'collaborative problem-solving' alongside 'Codex CLI' and 'REPL', though it misses common synonyms or invocation-style phrasings a user might actually say.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'interactive REPL / chat' framing carves a distinct niche from sibling codex skills, though broad triggers like 'debugging' and 'collaborative problem-solving' create minor overlap risk with the general codex-cli skill.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz
Path: skills/codex-chat/SKILL.md
Commit: 93ed392

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.