CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ralph-prompt-research

Generate Ralph-compatible prompts for research, analysis, and planning tasks. Creates prompts with systematic research phases, synthesis requirements, and deliverable specifications. Use when analyzing codebases, creating migration plans, researching technologies, auditing security, or any task requiring investigation before action.

66

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is ralph-prompt-research in fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable and well-sequenced content with strong workflow scaffolding and validation checkpoints, but it is a verbose monolith that duplicates template structure across the generic guide and worked examples. Splitting examples and the full phase templates into separate reference files would materially improve progressive disclosure and token efficiency.

Suggestions

Move the two fully worked example prompts into a separate references/EXAMPLES.md and keep only a brief pointer inline, since they re-derive the same five-phase structure already documented.

Extract the detailed per-phase markdown templates into a references/phase-templates.md file, leaving the SKILL.md body as a concise overview of the five phases and their checkpoints.

Trim the 'Best Practices', 'DO', and 'DON'T' sections, which largely restate the per-phase success criteria and completion checklist already present.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The document is a long monolith where the two worked examples largely restate the generic five-phase template, and the 'Best Practices'/'DO'/'DON'T' sections repeat guidance already implied by the phase success criteria; it could be tightened substantially without losing clarity.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready markdown templates with explicit placeholders plus two fully worked example prompts (security audit, framework comparison) that cover the common cases end-to-end.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced five-phase workflow with per-phase success criteria, explicit checkpoints ('DISCOVERY COMPLETE', 'ANALYSIS COMPLETE'), a final verification checklist, and 'If Stuck' recovery guidance.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the entire guide — generic phase templates, two long worked examples, and best practices — is inlined into a single monolithic SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete, natural-language phrases. The Ralph-specific framing aids distinctiveness, though the trigger list is broad and the action set is effectively single-purpose with descriptive attributes.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete prompt components ('systematic research phases, synthesis requirements, and deliverable specifications'), though the underlying action is essentially one ('Generate Ralph-compatible prompts') with attributes rather than many distinct actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Generate Ralph-compatible prompts... Creates prompts with...') and when ('Use when analyzing codebases... or any task requiring investigation before action') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ('analyzing codebases, creating migration plans, researching technologies, auditing security'), but lacks synonyms and file-extension-style variants that would push it to comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Ralph-compatible prompts' framing carves a clear niche, but the research/audit trigger terms ('analyzing codebases', 'auditing security') are broad enough to overlap with general research or audit skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (736 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.