CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ralph-prompt-single-task

Generate Ralph-compatible prompts for single implementation tasks. Creates prompts with clear completion criteria, automatic verification, and TDD approach. Use when creating prompts for bug fixes, single features, refactoring tasks, or any focused implementation that can be completed in one session.

66

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ralph-prompt-single-task/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with concrete templates, commands, and worked examples, and the workflow is clearly sequenced with checklists and feedback loops. Its main weakness is verbosity from repeating the full template across three examples rather than varying a single canonical template.

Suggestions

Show the full prompt template once in Step 3 and have Examples 1–3 vary only the task-specific fragments instead of reprinting the entire template each time.

Add an explicit validation gate at the end of the generation workflow (e.g., 'run the generated prompt's verification commands against a dry-run') before declaring the prompt ready.

Trim conceptual padding such as the 'Ralph Philosophy' paragraph, which explains ideas Claude can infer from the TDD and self-correction sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient but repeats the full prompt template three times across Examples 1–3 and includes conceptual padding like the 'Ralph Philosophy' paragraph, so it could be tightened by showing the template once and varying only the relevant fragments.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides a copy-paste-ready template, specific runnable commands (npm test, pytest, curl, grep, npm run typecheck), and three fully worked examples covering bug fix, feature, and refactor cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-step generation workflow (Analyze, Define Criteria, Structure, Add Verification) is present with a Validation Checklist and TDD feedback loops in the examples, but the generation steps themselves lack an explicit gate validating the produced prompt before use.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with clear headers and the file is self-contained with no nested references, but at ~360 lines the three full examples are inlined where they could be split into a separate examples file; no bundle files exist to verify deeper references.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete natural-language phrases. It is specific and well-scoped, with only minor overlap risk against sibling Ralph prompt skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Ralph-compatible prompts for single implementation tasks') and lists several concrete attributes ('clear completion criteria, automatic verification, and TDD approach'), but the skill's actual action is a single generate step rather than multiple distinct operations, leaving minor gaps versus comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Generate Ralph-compatible prompts... Creates prompts with clear completion criteria, automatic verification, and TDD approach') and when ('Use when creating prompts for bug fixes, single features, refactoring tasks, or any focused implementation') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural phrases users would say ('bug fixes, single features, refactoring tasks, focused implementation') with good coverage, but lacks synonyms and explicit file/extension-style variations needed for a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Ralph-compatible' / 'single implementation tasks' framing carves a clear niche with distinct triggers, but 'any focused implementation that can be completed in one session' creates minor overlap risk with the related multi-task and project prompt variants.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fernandezbaptiste/Skrillz
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.