Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid, action-oriented reference: executable code for all three connection methods and the core operations, with useful webhook payloads and provider notes. The main weaknesses are the missing validation/verification checkpoints (especially around the destructive disconnect operation), and a monolithic structure where SDK details and the DB schema could live in separate reference files.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the connection workflows: after generating a widget/auth session, instruct Claude to confirm success via the type: "auth" webhook or get-user-info before storing the connection, and to verify the terra_user_id (vs. reference_id) before calling the destructive disconnect-user operation.
Move the ~70 lines of mobile SDK integration code (iOS/Android/React Native) into a referenced file or defer to the terra-sdk skill, keeping SKILL.md focused on the connection lifecycle; similarly consider moving the SQL schema to a reference file.
De-duplicate the connect-user helper against Method 1/Method 2 (e.g., show the helper once and reference it from the method sections), and replace the hardcoded dev ID in mobile examples with a placeholder consistent with the env-var pattern used in the Python examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is code-first with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and sections like "Provider-Specific Notes" are appropriately terse. However, the ~40-line "connect-user" helper substantially re-implements what "Method 1" (widget) and "Method 2" (custom UI) already demonstrated, and the operation docstrings add padding — minor trims, matching anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The widget-session, authenticateuser, deauthenticateuser, and mobile SDK examples are concrete and nearly copy-paste ready, covering the common cases (widget flow, per-provider flow, iOS/Android/React Native, disconnect, user info, subscriptions). Minor gaps: the mobile examples hardcode a real-looking dev ID ("botaniqalmedtech-testing-SjyfjtG33s") instead of the env-var pattern used in Python, and "response.session_id" is unverifiable — anchor 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps) rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clearly presented (numbered 5-step widget user flow, 3-step SDK initialization flows), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints: nothing verifies a connection succeeded (e.g., via the type: "auth" webhook or get-user-info) before proceeding. The "disconnect-user" operation "revokes access, removes data" — a destructive operation — with no verification step, which caps this dimension at 3 per the rubric guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is good, but the skill is a single ~380-line file with no bundle files: ~70 lines of mobile SDK integration code (territory of the declared terra-sdk sibling) and the SQL database schema are inlined, and the "Related Skills" pointers cannot be verified. This fits anchor 3 (some structure; content that should be separate is inline) rather than anchor 4's 'most content appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |