Generate format-controlled research reports with evidence tracking, citations, and iterative review. This skill should be used when users request a research report, literature review, market or industry analysis, competitive landscape, policy or technical brief, or require a strict report template and section formatting that a single deepresearch pass cannot reliably enforce.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.13xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Research intake and evidence table
Report spec file
100%
100%
Subquestions count
100%
100%
Scope and exclusions
75%
100%
Query set present
100%
100%
Raw research files
100%
100%
Evidence table exists
100%
100%
Evidence table: Source ID column
100%
100%
Evidence table: Publisher and Date
100%
100%
Evidence table: Quality tier
0%
100%
Evidence table: Notes column
100%
100%
Source exclusion applied
100%
100%
Disqualifiers defined
60%
100%
Multi-pass parallel drafting workflow
Multiple draft files
100%
100%
Each draft is full report
66%
100%
No section-only files
100%
100%
Drafts written to files
100%
100%
Intermediate files preserved
100%
100%
UNION merge evidence
30%
100%
Final report H2 structure
100%
100%
Final report H3 subsections
100%
100%
Evidence table present
70%
100%
Report spec file
100%
100%
References section
100%
100%
Format compliance and citation verification
Completeness review file
100%
100%
Structure check documented
100%
100%
Citation check documented
100%
100%
Numeric claims cited
100%
100%
Conflicting sources flagged
100%
100%
Executive Summary section
100%
100%
Methodology section
100%
100%
Risks and Limitations section
100%
100%
Evidence table present
50%
100%
References/bibliography
100%
100%
H2 top-level sections
100%
100%
No inline URLs in prose
100%
100%
4f0eae8
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.