playground-project-brainstorm

Create an interactive HTML brainstorm explorer playground customized for the current project's architecture

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./playground-project-brainstorm/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and largely executable, with a clear phase-based workflow and concrete code. Its main weaknesses are the absence of an output validation step and a missing referenced template file, which together hold back workflow clarity and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Add a validation checkpoint after generation (e.g., verify the HTML references the config file and the config parses, and confirm the file opened in a browser) before declaring the task complete.

Ship the referenced template at templates/brainstorm-explorer.html (or document where it lives) so the `cp` step is actually executable from this skill bundle.

Move the full CONFIG schema and node-positioning guidelines into a reference file (e.g., references/config-schema.md) and summarize it inline, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is well-organized and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, with only minor sections (the example topic table and node-positioning ranges) that could be trimmed slightly.	4 / 5
Actionability	It provides a concrete CONFIG schema, exact file paths, and runnable commands (mkdir -p, cp, the script-tag edit, open), but the template file it copies is referenced but absent from this bundle, leaving a small execution gap.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The three-phase sequence and numbered generation steps are clear, but there is no validation checkpoint confirming the generated HTML/config loads or is well-formed before opening the browser, which the rubric treats as a missing feedback loop.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Section headers provide reasonable structure, but the full CONFIG spec and detailed guidance are inlined rather than split into reference files, and the referenced template file does not exist in the bundle (no references/scripts/assets/templates dirs).	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill builds but omits any explicit trigger/usage guidance, which caps completeness and limits trigger-term quality. It is specific enough to be distinguishable yet not comprehensive in enumerating its concrete actions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase, planning architectural changes, or mapping knowledge gaps').

Expand the action list to mention the concrete behaviors the body describes (visualize concepts as an interactive map, mark knowledge status, capture ideas, generate brainstorm-refiner prompts).

Include natural synonyms or phrasings a user would actually say (e.g., 'concept map', 'architecture map', 'brainstorm board') to broaden trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ("interactive HTML brainstorm explorer playground") and one concrete action ("Create"), but does not enumerate the several specific actions the skill actually performs (visualize, mark, draw, capture, generate), so it falls short of the comprehensive multi-action anchors at 4-5.	3 / 5
Completeness	It gives a clear "what" (create an interactive HTML brainstorm explorer) but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, which the rubric caps at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant natural terms like "brainstorm", "playground", and "project's architecture" are present, but there are no synonyms, file extensions, or common user phrasings beyond this single formulation.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The combination of "HTML brainstorm explorer playground" scoped to "the current project's architecture" carves a fairly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against general brainstorm or visualization skills.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: fernandezbaptiste/claude-playground-explorer
Path: playground-project-brainstorm/SKILL.md
Commit: 3f469de

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.