Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable scaffolding skill: concrete paths, a copy-adaptable template, and a validation command, with only minor gaps. Adding an error-recovery step after tsc and resolving the [module] placeholder would raise it further.
Suggestions
Add a feedback loop after validation (e.g., 'If tsc reports errors, fix them and re-run before finishing') to satisfy the top workflow-clarity anchor.
Explain how to resolve the '[module]' path segment when $ARGUMENTS only supplies a component name.
Reconcile the line-limit inconsistency: the template comment says '< 100 lines' of JSX while the checklist says '< 200 lines'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 45-line body contains zero concept explanations and no padding; the template's comments are task instructions rather than teaching, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths per component type, a complete TypeScript template, and a runnable validation command ('npx tsc --noEmit') give mostly executable guidance, but the '[module]' placeholder is never resolved and the template says 'clean JSX, < 100 lines' while the checklist says '< 200 lines'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 form a clear sequence with a checklist (step 4) and a validation checkpoint (step 5), but there is no explicit error-recovery loop after tsc validation, which the top anchor expects. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with well-organized sections and its single external reference ('docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5') is clearly signaled and one level deep; no bundle files exist to misorganize. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |