Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean skill: concrete paths, a ready-to-use template, a typed-props checklist, and an explicit validation command, with project-specific rules properly delegated to docs/ARCHITECTURE.md. The only real gaps are the missing test-scaffolding step promised in the description and the absence of an error-recovery loop after validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is entirely lean — no concept explanations, no padding; every line carries project-specific information Claude cannot infer (paths, house template, house rules), matching 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, a copy-paste Vue SFC template, and a specific validation command ('npx tsc --noEmit') provide mostly executable guidance. Not 5: the Props/Emits interfaces are placeholder comments, and the description's promised 'test scaffolding' never appears in the body — minor gaps per the anchor-4 definition. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence includes an explicit validation step and a checklist, but there is no feedback loop (no 'if tsc fails, fix and re-run') as in the anchor-5 example, so it fits 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized single-purpose skill with no bundle files; its only reference (docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5) is one level deep and clearly signaled, appropriately deferring architecture rules to the project doc — matching the simple-skill case for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |