Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable scaffold: lean templates, a concrete decision tree, and a typed validation step with almost no wasted tokens. The main gaps are the missing test-scaffolding step promised by the description, the absence of a fix-and-revalidate loop after `tsc --noEmit`, and a minor inconsistency between the template comment ("< 100 lines") and the checklist ("< 200 lines total").
Suggestions
Add the promised test-scaffolding step (e.g. create `ComponentName.test.tsx` alongside the component with a rendered smoke test), since the description advertises it but no step covers it.
Close the validation loop: after `npx tsc --noEmit`, instruct to fix type errors and re-run until it passes before finishing.
Reconcile the line-limit guidance — the templates say "< 100 lines" while the checklist says "< 200 lines total" — and move the two templates into a clearly labeled section or reference file for easier navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no React/TSX concept explanations, a terse decision tree, two compact templates, a checklist, and one validation command. It matches anchor 5 — every token earns its place — with nothing to trim down to anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, near-executable guidance: two full TSX templates, a deterministic server-vs-client decision tree, file-path conventions, and a runnable `npx tsc --noEmit` check. Not anchor 5 because the templates require placeholder substitution (XxxComponent, xxx.contracts), "Loading / error / empty states handled" is vague direction, and the test scaffolding promised in the description never appears in any step. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Validate: npx tsc --noEmit") and a supporting checklist, matching anchor 4. It misses anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop — no instruction on what to do when tsc fails (fix and re-validate) — and the checklist's vague items leave some checkpoints implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized numbered sections with a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`), and no bundle files to misplace content. It fits anchor 4's 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than 5: the ~76-line body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, and the two full templates inlined mid-workflow would sit more cleanly in their own sections or reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |