Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary concise, actionable skill: exact paths, a complete template, a verification checklist, and a concrete validation command with no wasted tokens. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a fix-and-retry loop around the "npx astro check" validation step. Structure and disclosure are appropriate for a skill of this size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~42-line body is lean and assumes competence: no concept explanations, no padding, and every line instructs (paths, template, checklist, command). The only nit — "Read docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5" repeated in the intro and step 1 — is too trivial to drop it from the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete: exact file paths per component type ("src/components/ComponentName.astro", "src/layouts/LayoutName.astro"), a copy-paste-ready Astro template with frontmatter/props/style structure, a six-item definition checklist, and the specific validation command "npx astro check". Placeholders like "prop1, prop2" are inherent to a scaffold template, not a gap. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Validate: npx astro check") and a post-creation checklist. It stops short of level 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. "if the check fails, fix and re-run") — the level-5 anchor requires that loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ("docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5") and a well-organized "## Steps" section; no bundle files exist or are needed. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this earns the top anchor on well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |