Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable scaffold: concrete paths, a complete code template, and a validation step, with nothing wasted on background explanation. The main gaps are a missing error-recovery loop after validation, no criteria for picking the component type, and no test scaffolding to back the description's claim.
Suggestions
Add a feedback loop after validation: "If tsc reports errors, fix them and re-run before finishing" — this closes the workflow_clarity gap.
Add one line of criteria for step 2 (when to choose feature vs shared vs page), or point to where in docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5 that decision rule lives.
Add a test-scaffolding step (e.g. "Create [name].component.spec.ts next to the component") so the body delivers what the description promises.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the checklist ("Standalone component ✅", "input()/output() signals ✅", "inject() for DI ✅", "OnPush change detection ✅") restates properties already visible in the code template. Minor redundancy to trim, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file-path patterns, a near copy-paste-ready component template, and a specific validation command ("npx tsc --noEmit") give mostly executable guidance. Minor gaps: no criteria for choosing feature vs shared vs page, and no test scaffolding despite the description promising it — short of the level-5 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly numbered with a validation checkpoint ("Validate: npx tsc --noEmit"), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. It lacks the error-recovery feedback loop ("if tsc fails, fix and re-run") required for level 5; the workflow is not destructive or batch, so the cap of 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external bundle files (none exist), and is well-organized with numbered steps; the single external pointer ("docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5") is clearly signaled. Per the simple-skill guideline, this scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |