Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, actionable instruction: exact file templates, naming conventions, hard rules, and a runnable validation command with zero filler. The only gaps keeping it from top marks are the absence of an inline example of a generated artifact and a feedback loop for handling validation failures.
Suggestions
Add a failure-handling step after validation, e.g. "If astro check reports errors, fix them and re-run until it passes".
Include one short example snippet of a generated file (e.g. a minimal service or adapter) so the expected shape is visible without opening docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~27-line body is lean and instruction-only: "Service: NO try/catch, NO .map()/.filter()/new Date()" and "Validate: npx astro check" carry maximum information per token, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding. This matches anchor 5 (every token earns its place) exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact file paths with templates ("types/[resource].types.ts - mirrors API exactly (snake_case)"), enumerated operations ("GET list, GET by ID, POST, PATCH, DELETE"), an example URL, and a runnable validation command. It stops short of anchor 5 because no example of a generated artifact is shown inline — file-content patterns are delegated entirely to docs/ARCHITECTURE.md — which is a minor gap rather than the pseudocode/missing-detail level of anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced (read docs, ask user, create files a-d in order, apply rules, validate) and end with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Validate: npx astro check"), matching anchor 4. It is not anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop for error recovery (what to do if astro check fails), and not anchor 3 since validation is explicitly present rather than missing or only implicit; the workflow creates files rather than performing destructive or batch operations, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, well-organized into a single ordered Steps section, and its only reference ("docs/ARCHITECTURE.md sections 4.1 (Services), 4.2 (Adapters), 4.3 (Types)") is one level deep and clearly signaled with specific section numbers. Per the rubric's guideline for short, simple skills, this matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |