Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable template for test creation: correct priority ordering across adapters/composables/components, concrete file naming, and a verification command. The only notable gap is the skeletal composable example and the absence of an explicit failure-handling loop after running vitest.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is pure instruction — numbered steps, three tight code templates, an output path, and a run command — with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place (anchor 5), and there is no over-explanation to justify dropping to 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The adapter and component templates plus the concrete "__tests__/OriginalName.spec.ts" path and "npx vitest run --reporter=verbose" command are mostly executable, but the composable example stops at imports and a vi.mock line with no actual test, a minor gap that keeps it at anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps (analyze, determine type, create, run) form a clear sequence and the final vitest run acts as a verification checkpoint; however there is no explicit fix-and-rerun feedback loop on failure, so it matches anchor 4 rather than anchor 5. Test creation is not destructive or batch, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (Steps, per-type templates with headers, explicit output location and command) and no need for external reference files; per the rubric's simple-skill note this earns anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |