Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured instruction skill: executable mapping commands, a concrete summary template, and a clear output criterion with no padding. Its only gaps are implicit commands for the endpoint/component listing steps and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout: executable find commands, one-line section instructions, and parentheticals ('simple shared state', 'server state') that state project conventions rather than concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The find commands are copy-paste ready and the summary template is concrete, but instructions like 'grep in services and server/api/' and 'List components and their responsibilities' leave the exact commands and source directories implicit, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps (map structure, summarize in the given format, output a 2-minute-understandable summary) are clearly sequenced with a final quality criterion, but there are no explicit validation or error-recovery checkpoints beyond that criterion, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files (none exist in the bundle), and is well organized with headers and a template, which per the rubric's simple-skill guideline earns anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |