Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a tight, well-organized single-purpose skill: an unambiguous map-then-summarize workflow, no padding, and section headings that double as the output template. The only real gaps are minor — the endpoint-grep step lacks a concrete command and the directory assumptions have no fallback. It is a strong example of a lean instructional skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient — terse section headings, one-line bullets, and two short find commands with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows — matching the anchor-5 example of every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The find commands are concrete and copy-paste ready, but "List the consumed endpoints (grep in services)" is a direction rather than an executable command, and the commands assume a fixed directory layout (src/lib/modules/$ARGUMENTS) with no fallback — anchor 4's "minor gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (map structure → summarize by section → output) that is read-only, so no destructive/batch validation cap applies; it stays at 4 rather than 5 because the grep step is underspecified and there is no guidance for edge cases like a module directory that doesn't exist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is organized into well-labeled sections — the rubric's simple-skill guideline explicitly scores this as 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |