Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent example of a lean, actionable instruction skill: a precise API-conversion mapping, concrete validation commands, and a clear sequenced workflow with no wasted tokens. The only gaps are the underspecified conditional steps 4–5 and the absence of an explicit validate-and-fix feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add a feedback loop after validation: 'If tsc or the build fails, fix the errors in the converted component and re-run all three checks before finishing.'
Make step 4 concrete — specify which composition pattern to apply for prop drilling (e.g. provide/inject or a shared composable).
Expand step 5 with a decomposition rule (e.g. 'extract template blocks over ~50 lines into child components named after their section').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~30 lean lines with a dense one-line-per-API mapping table and exact validation commands, and it explains nothing about Vue or Options API that Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching the anchor-5 example of lean, competence-assuming content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The conversion mapping ('props → defineProps<T>()', 'mixins: [] → extract to composable useXxx()') and validation commands ('npx tsc --noEmit', 'npx vite build', 'npx vitest run --passWithNoTests') are concrete and executable. It falls short of 5 because steps 4 ('Apply composition pattern if there is prop drilling') and 5 ('Decompose if > 200 lines') are high-level hints without the specific steps to execute them. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (read guide → analyze → convert → refine → decompose → validate) ends with an explicit validation step containing three concrete commands. It does not reach 5 because there is no feedback loop for error recovery (e.g. 'if tsc or the build fails, fix the errors and re-run'), which the anchor-5 example requires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well-organized with a Steps section, and its only reference (docs/ARCHITECTURE.md section 5) is clearly signaled twice and one level deep. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, this qualifies for 5 without external bundle files (none exist in this bundle). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |