Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token efficiency: a tightly organized phase plan with specific technology directives and explicit validation and approval checkpoints. Its main weakness is actionability — execution relies on `@migrator` and undocumented commands, leaving a gap between the plan and how to actually run or verify each step. A concrete validation command and a brief error-recovery instruction would close that gap.
Suggestions
Replace the generic 'Validate build/typecheck/tests' line with the actual commands to run (e.g., `npm run build`, `npx nuxi typecheck`, `npm run test`) so validation is executable.
Clarify what `@migrator` is (an agent, subcommand, or companion skill) or point to where its instructions live, since the whole workflow hinges on it.
Add a one-line error-recovery loop, e.g., 'If validation fails, fix errors and re-run before requesting approval for the next phase.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 26-line body is lean with zero padding: it opens with a one-line goal, states the argument, and lists the seven phases with terse technical directives ("no try/catch, replace $axios", "Options -> script setup"). Every token earns its place and no concepts Claude already knows are explained, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The phases include specific technical directives (create `.types.ts` + `.contracts.ts` + adapter, $fetch, useAsyncData/useState/Pinia, script setup), but execution is delegated to an undefined `@migrator` and no concrete commands or examples are given. This matches anchor 3 (some concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details) rather than 4 (mostly executable guidance). | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear phase sequence (0-6) is present with explicit checkpoints: "Validate build/typecheck/tests after each phase. Ask for approval before each phase." However, validation is generic (no actual build/typecheck/test commands) and there is no error-recovery feedback loop, so it fits anchor 4 rather than 5; the batch-operation cap at 3 does not apply since validation steps are stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files (none exist in the bundle), and is well organized into a goal line, argument line, and a Steps section. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this earns anchor 5 with well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |