Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, actionable instruction list: prioritized concrete fix rules, an exact validation command, and a clear reporting step. Its only real gap is the absence of an explicit failure-handling loop after validation fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~40 lines of lean pattern→fix mappings plus one exact validation command, with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. It matches 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete ordered fix rules ("try/catch in services -> remove, move error handling to load function"), an exact checker invocation, and a copy-paste validation command make the guidance mostly executable, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. Not 5 because entries like "type correctly" and "decompose" give direction without executable detail, and there is no handling for a missing $ARGUMENTS module. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (find via checker, fix by priority tier, validate after each fix, report) with an explicit validation checkpoint on this batch-modification workflow matches 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. Not 5 because no error-recovery loop is specified — nothing says what to do when svelte-check or the build fails after a fix (revert or fix forward). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; its well-organized sections (## Steps with Critical/Important/Improvements tiers) satisfy the simple-skill exception, so progressive disclosure scores 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |