Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable research-orchestration skill with strong workflow sequencing and mandatory validation checkpoints. The main drag is mild verbosity in some philosophical asides and the dense inline agent descriptions.
Suggestions
Trim philosophical asides (e.g. 'Delight is the absence of friction plus a moment of care') to keep the body lean and token-efficient.
Consider moving the seven agent-type definitions into a references/ file with a concise summary table inline, improving progressive disclosure toward the 5 anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance Claude would not auto-generate, but includes some philosophy padding ('Delight is the absence of friction plus a moment of care') and elaborated agent descriptions that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance for an orchestration skill — naming specific tools (AskUserQuestion, EnterPlanMode, mcp__context7__resolve_library_id, /ui) and concrete file sources (package.json, Gemfile, requirements.txt) — with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced with explicit MANDATORY checkpoints at Steps 1 and 4, plus feedback loops (re-ask if ambiguities remain, surface contradictions before synthesizing), matching the validate-and-recover anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers across a self-contained procedural skill that needs no external references; the 7 agent-type descriptions are somewhat dense inline but the structure is navigable, falling just short of the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |