Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced workflow and clean organization that defers the slides gotcha to a one-level reference. The only real weakness is minor redundancy and inferable explanation that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove the repeated MANDATORY line and the inferable 'typically used before use_figma' sentence to tighten conciseness toward a 3.
Consider collapsing the 'Skill Arguments' examples, which duplicate the usage examples already shown, into a single concise block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with a clear parameter table and decision tree, but the MANDATORY prerequisite is repeated from the frontmatter and 'This is typically used before use_figma when you need a fresh file to work with' states what Claude can infer; could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete parameter table, explicit defaults ('design', 'Untitled'), a copy-paste-ready JSON example for the create_new_file call, and a precise planKey decision tree — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced steps (resolve planKey → call create_new_file → use the result) with explicit branching for single vs. multiple plans; the operation is non-destructive, so absent feedback loops do not cap the score per the simple-skill note. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Workflow, Important Notes, Editor-specific notes) with a single clearly signaled one-level reference ('See figma-use-slides → slide-grid') that appropriately offloads the slides edge case rather than inlining it. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |