CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

figma-use-figjam

This skill helps agents use Figma's use_figma MCP tool in the FigJam context. Can be used alongside figma-use which has foundational context for using the use_figma tool.

65

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exemplar of a well-structured skill: lean and assumption-respecting, highly actionable with concrete tool calls and error strings, a clearly sequenced inspection-before-mutation workflow, and excellent progressive disclosure through 13 verified one-level-deep references. No meaningful weaknesses against this rubric.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and high-signal with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; each section (inspection, deferred tools, text mutation recipe, image upload) earns its place, and the single ToolSearch example is fully justified.

3 / 3

Actionability

It gives concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact tool names, the `select:` ToolSearch syntax, precise error strings to avoid, and the upload_assets call shape with nodeId/count semantics — making it copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

It sequences a clear workflow (get_figjam upfront for IDs → batch-load references → batch ToolSearch schemas → canonical text-edit recipe) with explicit guardrails and checkpoints (no createPage, get_metadata fails on FigJam, load font before mutate) and points batch/destructive work at the batch-modify reference.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md is a concise overview pointing to 13 one-level-deep reference files, all verified present, each clearly signaled with a one-line description, and plan-board-content explicitly delegates to the node-type specifics — easy navigation with no nested indirection.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear FigJam-scoped niche and distinguishes itself from the related figma-use skill, but it lacks concrete listed actions and any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, capping completeness and trigger quality. Adding natural user trigger terms and an explicit use-when clause would lift it substantially.

Suggestions

Add concrete FigJam actions to the description, e.g. "Create and edit FigJam boards — stickies, sections, connectors, shapes, tables, and text nodes via the use_figma MCP tool."

Append an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when creating or editing FigJam boards, stickies, sections, connectors, or running board-generation tasks (retros, brainstorms, ice breakers, meeting boards)."

Replace the meta-guidance "Can be used alongside figma-use" with user-facing trigger terms (board, sticky, retro, brainstorm) so the description reads as natural keywords a user would say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the tool and domain ("use Figma's use_figma MCP tool in the FigJam context") but lists no concrete FigJam actions such as creating stickies, sections, or connectors, so it stops at domain-and-some-actions rather than multiple specific actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

It answers what the skill does but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, and the rubric caps completeness at 2 when such explicit trigger guidance is missing.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the relevant terms "FigJam" and "use_figma" but omits natural phrasings a user would actually say (board, sticky, retro, brainstorm, connector) and offers no common variations, so coverage is partial.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It is clearly scoped to the FigJam context and explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling figma-use skill, giving it a distinct niche unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 4 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
figma/mcp-server-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.