Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, concrete, and well-structured, with executable commands and validation-gated workflows for the destructive golden-update operation. Minor gaps in deferred CLI specifics and a slightly long manual-validation section keep it just below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of pytest or golden images); a few explanatory passages like the 'Important: Golden tests lock mflux-native sampling...' note could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly executable with concrete justfile recipes, an explicit env var, specific paths, and a commit-message example; the manual-validation path defers specifics to the mflux-cli skill, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered workflows with validation checkpoints (explicit user-approval gate, hardware validation, correctness check) for the destructive golden-update operation, with only minor validation gaps and no explicit error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a one-level-deep, clearly signaled delegation to the mflux-cli skill; no bundle files exist, and the manual-validation section is slightly long but appropriately placed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |