Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, action-dense skill body with clear multi-step workflow and validation loops, plus appropriately signaled one-level-deep references. The only minor gap is the absence of the referenced resources/ bundle to verify the reference structure actually resolves.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced resources/*.md files in the bundle so the one-level-deep reference structure is verifiable and complete.
Consider adding a single compact worked example (e.g., one short paragraph rewrite showing verb upgrade + anti-AI fix) to make the protocols immediately concrete.
A brief inline Claim-Evidence Map template skeleton would let the VERIFY scene be directly copy-pasted rather than re-derived.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or basic-concept explanation; every section earns its tokens and assumes Claude's competence, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete guidance including a banned-verb list, numeric sentence-length ranges, paragraph templates, and a failure/recovery table; specific examples cover common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear canonical READ→PLAN→DRAFT→AUDIT→REVERSE-OUTLINE→POLISH sequence with explicit validation loops (audit against checklist, re-run after fixes) and a failure-recovery table, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to resources/*.md; the references directory is not present in the bundle to verify, keeping it just below a perfect 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |