CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

oma-academic-writer

Academic writing specialist for publication-grade English prose. Drafts, revises, and audits essays, reports, analysis sections, executive summaries, conclusions, and literature reviews while enforcing sentence-structure variation, high-frequency academic verbs, calibrated hedging, and anti-AI stylistic compliance. USE for academic writing, essay polish, paragraph rewrite, prose revision against any rubric tier (HD/D/C, A/B/C, top-band/mid-band, etc.), anti-AI audit, reverse outlining, claim-evidence mapping, and rubric enforcement on assignments.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable academic-prose skill with clear sequencing, explicit audit/re-run feedback loops, and properly externalized one-level references. Its main weakness is redundancy: the four protocols are restated across the Scenes, Actions, Canonical path, and Guardrails, inflating the token budget without adding new guidance.

Suggestions

Consolidate the four-protocol description into one canonical section (e.g., Scenes) and have the Actions table and Canonical workflow path reference it rather than restating it, cutting roughly 30-40 lines of repetition.

The full banned-verb list and word-length/dash/semicolon thresholds appear in the Guardrails and overlap with the referenced academic-verb-tiers.md and sentence-structure-reference.md; keep only the operative short list inline and defer the full corpus to the reference file.

Verify the referenced bundle files actually exist at resources/*.md and ../_shared/core/*.md, since none are present in this review bundle; missing reference targets would break the progressive-disclosure design.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids concept-padding Claude already knows, but at ~170 lines it restates the four protocols across the Scenes, the Actions table, the Canonical workflow path, and the Guardrails, so it could be tightened. Not the level-3 'every token earns its place' bar, but well above the verbose level-1 anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill it gives concrete executable guidance: a banned-verb list, word-length bands (8-15/16-25/26-40), em-dash <=1 and semicolon <=2/1000w limits, the four-sentence-type protocol, Topic-Support-Conclude, and a Claim-Evidence Map, satisfying the 'concrete specific guidance' bar for instruction skills.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-scene sequence plus a Canonical workflow path, with explicit validation feedback loops (VERIFY audit, 're-run audit'), a failure-and-recovery retry table, and a read-aloud checkpoint before emit, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references (resources/anti-ai-checklist.md, sentence-structure-reference.md, academic-verb-tiers.md, hedging-guide.md, _shared/core/*) collected in a References section, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. Note: the referenced files are not present in this review bundle, but the structural design itself is sound.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities and pairs them with an explicit 'USE for' trigger clause covering natural user phrasing. It cleanly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it with minimal fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions ('Drafts, revises, and audits') across a enumerated document types (essays, reports, analysis sections, executive summaries, conclusions, literature reviews), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (drafts/revises/audits academic prose under four protocols) and 'when' via an explicit 'USE for ...' trigger clause, satisfying the top anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'USE for academic writing, essay polish, paragraph rewrite, prose revision ... anti-AI audit, reverse outlining, claim-evidence mapping' clause covers natural phrases a user would actually say when they need this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (publication-grade academic English prose) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for translation, search, or code-doc tasks.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
first-fluke/oh-my-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.