Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill with an explicit scene-based workflow, strong validation checkpoints, and clear one-level-deep reference routing. Its weakest point is redundancy — duplicated output listings and dependency/reference repetition — which inflates token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Merge the "Expected outputs" bullets with the `outputs:` YAML block into a single source of truth to remove near-duplicate content.
Consolidate the Dependencies and References sections, which list the same resources/ files twice with slightly different annotations.
Fold the "Intent signature" signals into "When to use" (or vice versa) since both enumerate the same triggering conditions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense and avoids explaining known concepts, but outputs are stated twice ("Expected outputs" bullets and the near-duplicate `outputs:` YAML block), the Dependencies list repeats the References list, and "Intent signature" overlaps "When to use" — it could be meaningfully tightened, fitting anchor 3 rather than 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete destinations ("docs/decisions/", ".agents/results/architecture/"), a runnable command ("oma diagram resolve"), and an explicit situation-to-mode mapping make the guidance mostly executable; the gap is that method mechanics (ATAM/CBAM procedures, templates) are deferred to resources files, matching anchor 4 with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The PREPARE→ACQUIRE→REASON→VERIFY→FINALIZE scene sequence is explicit, with a dedicated VERIFY checkpoint, a failure-and-recovery section with feedback loops, and a pre-handoff checklist — matching the anchor requiring clear sequence, explicit validation, and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body acts as a well-organized overview with one-level-deep, purpose-annotated references ("resources/execution-protocol.md for workflow", "../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md"), but the duplicated Dependencies/References listing and the absence of the referenced bundle files to verify leave minor organization gaps, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |