Conciseness

The body avoids explaining known concepts and stays skill-specific, but contains clear duplication: the parallel spawn commands appear in both "Canonical command path" and "Step 2", simple-task routing is stated in both "When NOT to use" and "Transitions", and guardrail 5 repeats the "--isolation worktree" note from the CLI options line. It sits between anchor 3 (mostly efficient, could be tightened) and anchor 2, but the padding is repetition rather than unnecessary explanation, so 3 fits best.

Actionability

Guidance is mostly executable with concrete commands and real flags ("oma agent spawn backend ... --task-id ... -w ./backend &", "--vendor", "--read-only", "--isolation worktree") and specific artifacts ("oma-config.yaml" fields, "{memoryConfig.basePath}/progress-{agentId}-{taskId}-{runId}-{sessionId}.md"). Not a 5 because commands use unresolved placeholders ("plan.backend_task.id", "<pm-prompt-file>") and are patterns rather than copy-paste ready.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit (Entry, PREPARE/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE scenes, four workflow steps) with explicit validation checkpoints (contract alignment in Step 3, QA review as mandatory final step), a feedback loop ("Resolve blocking defects ... rerun affected checks before finalizing"), a dedicated failure-and-recovery section, and a 7-item guardrail checklist. This matches the anchor-5 example's validate-fix-retry structure; it is clearly above anchor 4, which allows missing checkpoints.

Progressive Disclosure

Operational detail is appropriately pushed into bundle files, and all four paths cited in the body (references/_shared/core/code-intelligence.md, collaboration-policy.md, execution-policy.md, references/_shared/runtime/memory-protocol.md) exist with no nested references (one level deep, verified by grep). Not a 5 because the references are mostly buried as inline mentions and the final "References" section lists only one of the four cited files, leaving navigation gaps (including six bundle files never surfaced from SKILL.md).

Specificity

"Coordinate assigned specialist tasks and handoffs manually" names the domain and about two concrete actions (task coordination, handoffs), but "coordinate" is generic and no further specific capabilities (spawn, monitor, QA review) are listed. This matches anchor 3; it is not anchor 4, which requires several specific actions with only minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

Both parts are present: the "what" ("Coordinate assigned specialist tasks and handoffs manually") and an explicit "when" clause ("Use when supervising a multi-agent project step by step"). It is not capped at 3 because the "Use when..." trigger is explicit, but it falls short of anchor 5 since neither the what nor the when includes concrete trigger phrases like the specialist domains (frontend, backend, QA) or the manual-vs-automated contrast.

Trigger Term Quality

"multi-agent project", "step by step", and "supervising" are phrases a user might naturally say, but common variations such as "coordinate agents", "orchestrate", "spawn agents", or "manual execution" are absent. This is anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing variations) rather than anchor 4 (good coverage with only a few natural terms missing).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"manually" and "step by step" carve out a manual-supervision niche that is unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, giving mostly distinct triggers. It is not anchor 5 because "multi-agent project" would also naturally trigger a competing orchestrator skill and the description never states the contrast explicitly, and it is above anchor 3 because the manual/step-by-step qualifiers do most of the differentiation work.