Conciseness

The body is dense and free of pedagogical fluff, but contains clear redundancy: the same "oma agent spawn backend/frontend ... &" command block appears twice nearly verbatim (canonical command path and Step 2), the code-intelligence rule is stated in both "Tools and instruments" and Guardrail 6, and the "Scheduling" meta-section (Intent signature / Expected inputs / Control-flow features) largely restates the workflow and transitions. Mostly efficient but could be meaningfully tightened.

Actionability

Provides mostly executable guidance: concrete commands with real flags ("oma agent spawn pm <pm-prompt-file> <session-id> --task-id ... -w ./pm", "--isolation worktree", "--read-only", "--vendor"), an explicit vendor-resolution rule (oma-config.yaml "agents:" override else "model_preset"), and a concrete progress-file naming convention. Falls short of anchor 5 because authoring the prompt files and locating the injected run artifacts/receipts are left unspecified.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops: PREPARE/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE scenes, a dedicated VERIFY checkpoint ("Monitor progress and API/data contract alignment"), a mandatory final QA step with rerun ("rerun affected checks before finalizing"), a failure-and-recovery section with loops (pause downstream work on contract divergence, reissue focused instructions on stalls), and a 7-item guardrail checklist. This matches the top anchor better than anchor 4, whose 'minor validation gaps' do not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-sectioned single-file body with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to shared docs ("../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md", "../_shared/runtime/memory-protocol.md") and an "Automated Alternative" pointer to the orchestrator skill. Minor organization gaps: the trailing "## References" heading is empty and the ../_shared paths sit outside this bundle so cannot be verified, keeping it below anchor 5.

Specificity

"Coordinate assigned specialist tasks and handoffs manually" names the domain and two actions (coordinating specialist tasks, managing handoffs), but omits the concrete operations the body actually performs (spawning agents, monitoring progress, contract alignment, QA review). This matches the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor, not the 'several specific actions' level.

Completeness

Both parts are present: the what ("Coordinate assigned specialist tasks and handoffs manually") and an explicit when ("Use when supervising a multi-agent project step by step"). The when clause is generic and could name concrete triggers like complex multi-domain features, so it falls short of the fully explicit anchor 5.

Trigger Term Quality

"supervising a multi-agent project step by step" provides relevant natural keywords (multi-agent, handoffs, step by step), but misses common variations users would say such as "orchestrate", "delegate", "agent spawn", or the specialist role names. Some relevant keywords, missing common synonyms.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"manually" and "supervising... step by step" clearly carve out manual supervision versus an automated orchestrator sibling skill, leaving only minor overlap risk with closely related coordination/orchestration skills. Not fully distinct (anchor 5) since "multi-agent project" language still overlaps the orchestrator's territory.