Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body lays out a well-sequenced multi-agent workflow with validation and recovery loops, but suffers from redundant sections, an inconsistent spawning mechanism, and a dangling external reference.
Suggestions
Collapse the overlapping Scheduling, Structural Flow, and Workflow sections into one linear procedure to remove redundancy and reduce token cost.
Reconcile the agent-spawning instructions: pick either `oma agent:spawn` or `spawn-agent.sh`/`oma-config.yaml` and define whichever you keep, so Step 2 matches the canonical command path.
Either create the referenced `resources/examples.md` (under references/) or remove the dangling reference so progressive disclosure points to a real file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Scheduling, Structural Flow, and Workflow sections substantially restate the same steps and guardrails, so it could be tightened considerably. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete `oma agent:spawn ... -w ./backend &` commands appear, but Step 2 introduces `spawn-agent.sh` and `agent_cli_mapping in oma-config.yaml` that are otherwise undefined and conflict with the canonical `oma agent:spawn` path, leaving the spawning mechanism ambiguous. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear PREPARE/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (contract alignment, QA review as final step) and feedback loops (re-spawn on CRITICAL issues, pause on contract divergence) is provided. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and keeps its single reference one level deep, but the referenced `resources/examples.md` is not a real bundle file (no references/ directory exists), so navigation is not actually backed by the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |