Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced debugging protocol with strong workflow clarity, explicit verification checkpoints, and recovery paths, but roughly half the body is abstract agent-schema metadata (SSL primitives, resource scopes, control-flow features) that spends tokens without adding executable guidance, and its many references point to files absent from the bundle. Tightening the meta sections into concrete commands and consolidating the duplicated dependency/reference listings would lift both conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
Cut or compress the schema-descriptive sections (Actions/SSL-primitive table, Resource scope, Control-flow features) into the concrete workflow they summarize, keeping only directives Claude can act on.
Replace abstract rows like "Infer root cause | INFER | Diagnostic reasoning" with executable guidance, e.g. example reproduction commands, a sample rg search against a stack trace, and how to run and scope the regression test.
Consolidate the Dependencies and References sections into one clearly navigable list, and ensure every referenced file (resources/*.md, ../_shared/core/*) actually ships in the bundle or drop the dead paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but meta-descriptive sections add tokens without instructing: the Actions table's "SSL primitive" column (`CALL_TOOL`, `READ`, `INFER`), the "Resource scope" table (CODEBASE/LOCAL_FS/PROCESS/MEMORY), and "Control-flow features" describe the agent's shape rather than telling Claude what to do, and the Scheduling section's "Intent signature"/"When to use" duplicate the frontmatter description. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists ("rg \"<error-message-or-symbol>\"", "Document in `.agents/results/bugs/`", "run the smallest reproduction command first"), but the bulk of "Logical Operations" is an abstract taxonomy — "Infer root cause | INFER | Diagnostic reasoning" — with no executable commands or examples, and key details like what a reproduction or verification command looks like are left to the referenced files that are not present in the bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Entry → Scenes (PREPARE/ACQUIRE/REASON/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE) → Exit arc is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation stage ("VERIFY: Re-run failing and related checks"), a feedback loop ("If the first fix fails verification, return to root-cause analysis"), and failure/recovery paths for missing environments and infeasible regression tests. This matches the top anchor: clear sequence, explicit checkpoints, error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The References section is one level deep and signals purpose per file ("Checklist (pre-submit self-verification): `resources/checklist.md`"), but no bundle files exist in `references/`, `scripts/`, or `assets/` and every referenced path (`resources/*.md`, `../_shared/core/*`, `../oma-observability/SKILL.md`) resolves to nothing in the bundle, and the Dependencies section duplicates the reference list loosely, leaving navigation unreliable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |