Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, clearly sequenced debug workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, supported by concrete search/tool examples and well-organized external references. Its main weakness is abstract framework ceremony (SSL primitive labels, dense scaffolding) that competes with the lean executable guidance.
Suggestions
Drop the abstract 'SSL primitive' labels in the Actions table (CALL_TOOL/READ/INFER/VALIDATE/NOTIFY) — Claude already knows which tool primitive to apply; show the concrete command or tool call for each action instead.
Add a concrete reproduction and verification command example next to the `rg` search example (e.g., a failing-test invocation and its re-run) so the core debug loop is executable, not just the search step.
Convert the `resources/*.md` references into markdown links and consider moving the dense Scheduling/Scenes framework into a referenced file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Line-level prose is lean, but the Scheduling/Scenes scaffolding and the 'Actions' table mapping each step to abstract 'SSL primitive' labels (CALL_TOOL, READ, INFER, VALIDATE, NOTIFY) add ceremonial overhead that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (`rg ...`, `find_symbol(...)`, `search_for_pattern(...)`) and actionable directive guidance for the fix/test/verify loop, with minor gaps where reproduction and verification commands are project-specific and left abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Entry → Scenes (PREPARE...VERIFY...FINALIZE) → Exit flow with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint, a feedback loop ('If the first fix fails verification, return to root-cause analysis'), and an inline guardrail checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Detailed materials are appropriately split into well-labeled one-level-deep references (execution-protocol, checklist, error-playbook, common-patterns), though the overview itself is dense and references use plain paths rather than navigable links. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |