Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and workflow-clear: executable commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and a thorough failure/recovery model. Its weakness is progressive disclosure — the body is dense and largely monolithic with only a single one-level reference, where more material could be offloaded to the design doc.
Suggestions
Move the per-file dependency list, actions table, and resource-scope table into the design doc (008-oma-docs.md), keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with signaled pointers.
Replace the repeated inline 'No LLM call' caveats across six file entries with a single consolidated host-LLM contract note to reduce repetition.
Add explicit bundle reference files (e.g. a REFERENCES.md for the CLI flag matrix) so detail lives one level deep rather than inline in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section delivers concrete CLI behavior or guardrails rather than padding. The only mild redundancy is the repeated 'No LLM call' caveat, which is minor and earns its place by clarifying the host-LLM contract. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands with exact flags and comments (e.g. 'oma docs verify --json', '--report-file ./drift-report.md', '--no-urls', 'oma docs sync HEAD~5..HEAD'), plus concrete interactive prompts and git apply steps. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Entry → Scenes → Transitions → Failure-and-recovery → Exit sequence with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint (JSON schema / candidate-list validation) and a dedicated failure-and-recovery section covering parse errors, missing lychee, context limits, and write failures. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference (design doc 008-oma-docs.md) is one level deep and clearly signaled in the References section, but no bundle files exist and the ~280-line body inlines substantial detail (full dependency list, actions table, resource scope) that could be split out, leaning monolithic. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |