CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

oma-explainer

Turn a code change (diff, PR, branch, commit range) into a rich, self-contained interactive HTML explainer with Background / Intuition / Code / Quiz sections. Use for explain, walkthrough, code-change explanation, diff/PR/branch explainer requests — 설명서, 해설, コード解説, 代码讲解. Produces a single offline-capable HTML file with diagrams, callouts, and an accessible quiz.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured orchestration skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. The main weakness is mild redundancy (SSL-primitive ceremony and repeated Dependencies/Resources listings) that slightly inflates the token budget.

Suggestions

Drop the 'Logical Operations' SSL-primitive column (SELECT/READ/WRITE/VALIDATE/NOTIFY) — it is abstract ceremony that adds tokens without actionable value; the Actions table already lists the steps and evidence.

Consolidate the duplicated dependency/resource listings: 'Dependencies', 'Tools and instruments', and 'References' all repeat git, gh, Serena, and the two resource files — keep one canonical list and reference it.

Inline the one or two grep-checklist anchors the VALIDATE step depends on, or confirm the referenced resource files are bundled, since references/ and assets/ are currently empty and the validation step leans on html-contract.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and table-driven, but the 'Logical Operations' SSL-primitive table (SELECT/READ/WRITE/VALIDATE/NOTIFY) is ceremonial jargon, and the Dependencies/Resources listings are duplicated across the Scheduling, Tools, and References sections — minor padding that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands are given throughout (gh pr diff, git diff main...{branch}, git diff --cached, HEAD~1..HEAD, oma explain validate [file], output path pattern) with an explicit ref-resolution order; minor gaps exist because the actual HTML authoring detail is delegated to resource files not present in the bundle.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear RESOLVE→COLLECT→GATE→GENERATE→VALIDATE→DELIVER sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (dual secret gates pre/post generation), a bounded fix-and-revalidate feedback loop (max 3 iterations), and a dedicated Failure/recovery section.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body stays lean as an overview and delegates the WHAT and HOW contracts to two clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (resources/document-structure.md and resources/html-contract.md), with a final References section for navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that names concrete deliverables, provides explicit 'Use for …' trigger guidance with multilingual synonyms, and occupies a distinct niche. It fully satisfies the what/when/completeness bar.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'interactive HTML explainer with Background / Intuition / Code / Quiz sections' and 'single offline-capable HTML file with diagrams, callouts, and an accessible quiz' — giving comprehensive coverage of what it produces.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Turn a code change … into a rich, self-contained interactive HTML explainer') and when ('Use for explain, walkthrough, code-change explanation, diff/PR/branch explainer requests') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage including 'explain, walkthrough, code-change explanation, diff/PR/branch explainer' plus multilingual synonyms (설명서, 해설, コード解説, 代码讲解) that users would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche — interactive HTML explainer documents for code changes — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk; the specific section contract (Background/Intuition/Code/Quiz) further separates it from generic doc/qa skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
first-fluke/oh-my-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.