CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

oma-explainer

Turn a code change (diff, PR, branch, commit range) into a rich, self-contained interactive HTML explainer with Background / Intuition / Code / Quiz sections. Use for explain, walkthrough, code-change explanation, diff/PR/branch explainer requests — 설명서, 해설, コード解説, 代码讲解. Produces a single offline-capable HTML file with diagrams, callouts, and an accessible quiz.

68

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The workflow is sequenced and validated exceptionally well, but the body is verbose through triple-representation of the same pipeline and delegates its concrete HTML authoring contract to resource files that are not bundled, weakening actionability and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Bundle resources/document-structure.md and resources/html-contract.md (or inline a minimal HTML template + grep checklist) so the skill is actionable without missing external files.

Collapse the duplicated pipeline across Scheduling, Scenes, Actions, and Guardrails into one canonical sequence with cross-references to remove repeated secret-gate and validation wording.

Add at least one concrete, copy-pasteable HTML skeleton or section example in the body rather than describing the output contract only by reference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what git or HTML is), but the same flow is restated across Scheduling, Structural Flow Scenes, Logical Operations Actions, Effects, and Guardrails — e.g. the dual secret gates are repeated ~5 times — so not every token earns its place.

2 / 3

Actionability

Ref resolution gives concrete executable commands (gh pr diff, git diff --cached, git diff main...{branch}, the .agents/results/explain/{date}-{slug}.html path), but the core authoring guidance is delegated to resources/document-structure.md and resources/html-contract.md, which are not bundled here, so the HTML contract itself is not executable from the body alone.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear RESOLVE→COLLECT→GATE→GENERATE→VALIDATE→DELIVER sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: dual secret gates, a fix→re-validate loop capped at 3 iterations, plus enumerated failure/recovery and exit criteria — matching the anchor for clear sequencing with feedback loops.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep and clearly signaled with their purpose (Dependencies and References sections), but the referenced files (resources/document-structure.md, resources/html-contract.md, .agents/workflows/explain.md) do not exist in the bundle, so the actual disclosure structure is empty where the skill depends on it most.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities, gives an explicit "Use for" trigger clause, and covers natural (including multilingual) trigger terms. It is specific enough to distinguish this skill from neighboring oma-* skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Turn a code change (diff, PR, branch, commit range) into a rich, self-contained interactive HTML explainer" and "Produces a single offline-capable HTML file with diagrams, callouts, and an accessible quiz", naming the Background/Intuition/Code/Quiz sections explicitly.

3 / 3

Completeness

Answers both what (turn a code change into a self-contained HTML explainer) and when via an explicit "Use for ..." clause naming the triggering request types, matching the anchor for a complete description.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasing is well covered — "explain, walkthrough, code-change explanation, diff/PR/branch explainer requests" — plus multilingual equivalents (설명서, 해설, コード解説, 代码讲解) that a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear — an interactive HTML explainer for code changes — and triggers are qualified by output medium and request type, making overlap with sibling skills (video, slides, docs drift) unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
first-fluke/oh-my-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.