Conciseness

Mostly tabular and terse, but contains clear slack: the 'Structural Flow' scenes (PREPARE/ACT/VERIFY/RECOVER/FINALIZE) duplicate the 'Workflow Phases' (PHASE 1-5), the 'Logical Operations' SSL-primitive table (READ/WRITE/CALL_TOOL...) is abstract bookkeeping that adds no executable value, and the 'Scheduling' intent-signature section restates the frontmatter description. Not 2 because there is no padding that explains concepts Claude already knows and most sections are dense and useful.

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable commands ('oma agent:spawn <agent-type> "<task>" <session-id> -w <workspace>', 'oma verify ... --json', 'claude --agent <agent>'), a defaults table (MAX_PARALLEL=3, MAX_RETRIES=2, POLL_INTERVAL=30s), a complete mcp.json example, loop-limit tables, and a ready-to-use review feedback template. Not 5 because key operational detail is delegated to files that do not exist in the bundle (e.g., 'resources/subagent-prompt-template.md' for prompt construction) and the 'oh-my-ag agent:spawn' fallback never gets a full invocation example.

Workflow Clarity

The multi-step process is clearly sequenced (Entry -> Scenes -> Transitions -> Failure/recovery -> Exit, plus PHASE 1-5) with explicit validation checkpoints and a drawn feedback loop: mechanical self-check -> 'oma verify' (exit 0/1 handling) -> QA cross-review, with FAIL paths feeding fixes back, explicit loop limits, and a tiered retry policy. This matches the top anchor including feedback loops for error recovery and checklists for a complex process.

Progressive Disclosure

Judged against the actual bundle: only 'scripts/spawn-agent.sh', 'scripts/parallel-run.sh', and 'scripts/verify.sh' exist, while the body's references to 'resources/subagent-prompt-template.md', 'resources/memory-schema.md', 'config/cli-config.yaml', 'templates/', and all '../_shared/core/*' paths point to files absent from the bundle, breaking navigation. Additionally, detailed material that clearly belongs in separate files (the full CD monitoring protocol, the review-loop spec, the review feedback format) is inlined. Not 1 because references are one level deep and clearly signaled rather than nested or buried, and the SKILL.md does function as an overview.

Specificity

Names the domain ('multi-agent orchestrator') and several concrete actions — 'spawns CLI subagents in parallel, coordinates via MCP Memory, and monitors progress' — which matches 'several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage'. Not 5 because major capabilities from the body (task decomposition, verification/QA review loop, retries, result collection) are absent; not 3 because more than 1-2 concrete actions are listed.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ('spawns CLI subagents in parallel, coordinates via MCP Memory, and monitors progress') and when ('Use for orchestration, parallel execution, and automated multi-agent workflows'). Not 5 because the 'when' clause lacks concrete trigger phrases users would actually utter (e.g., 'when the user says run it automatically'); not 3 because both what and when are explicitly present.

Trigger Term Quality

'Use for orchestration, parallel execution, and automated multi-agent workflows' gives good natural keyword coverage a user would plausibly say. Not 5 because common variations and synonyms are missing (e.g., 'spawn agents', 'run it automatically', 'coordinate agents'); not 3 because the included terms are natural and relevant rather than missing variations.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Multi-agent orchestration with CLI subagents and MCP Memory coordination is a clear, mostly distinct niche with trigger terms unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not 5 because it could overlap with sibling coordination skills (the body itself references a separate 'oma-coordination' skill) and generic 'orchestration' requests; not 3 because the described mechanism is fairly specific.