Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized instruction skill with clear multi-step sequencing, explicit validation checkpoints, error-recovery feedback loops, and concrete actionable guidance. Main weaknesses are reference duplication / overlapping trigger sections (conciseness) and references that point to files not present in the bundle (progressive disclosure).
Suggestions
Deduplicate the References section — keep a single clearly labeled bullet list of reference files rather than restating them as prose sentences first.
Consolidate the overlapping 'Intent signature', 'When to use', and 'When NOT to use' sections to reduce redundancy and tighten token usage.
Either include the referenced resources/ and ../_shared/core/ files in the bundle or note that they are provided by the runtime, so the references resolve to real navigable content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense and well-structured, but the References section lists the same files twice (narrative form then a bullet list) and the When-to-use/Intent-signature/When-NOT-to-use sections overlap, introducing noticeable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — explicit guardrails ('Every task has: agent, title, acceptance criteria, priority, dependencies'), concrete output paths (plan-{sessionId}.json, current-plan.md), and before/after pitfall examples — with only minor gaps (no sample JSON plan or inlined task schema). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clearly sequenced Entry -> PREPARE/REASON/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE scenes with an explicit VERIFY validation checkpoint and a Failure-and-recovery section providing feedback loops (vague criteria -> rewrite testable; too broad -> split into phases). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points one level deep to clearly signaled reference files (resources/execution-protocol.md, examples.md, iso-planning.md, shared core docs), but the referenced paths do not resolve to actual bundle files and the reference listing is duplicated. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |