Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear scene-based workflow, explicit verification and failure-recovery sections, and genuinely concrete guardrails and pitfalls. It is held back by repeated output-path and ISO statements, an abstract canonical workflow whose core artifact (the plan JSON) is never exemplified, and a References section whose targets are absent from the bundle and whose list formatting is broken.
Suggestions
Include a minimal example task object (agent, title, priority tier, dependencies, acceptance criteria, scope) or an inline excerpt of the task schema so the plan artifact is concrete without needing resources/task-template.json.
State the save paths and ISO-structuring guidance once (e.g., in Expected outputs) and remove the repetitions in the canonical workflow, guardrail 6, and the stray line inside the References section.
Fix the References section formatting so it is an uninterrupted, consistently styled list, and ensure the referenced resources/ files actually ship in the skill bundle or drop the dead paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and does not explain known concepts, but the save-path instruction ("Save plan to `.agents/results/plan-{sessionId}.json`...") is repeated across the Expected outputs, YAML outputs block, canonical workflow, guardrail 6, and References, ISO framing appears twice, and "Control-flow features" is meta-description that could be cut. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists (guardrail 2's explicit task fields, pitfalls with real examples like "'Implement user auth API' is one task, not five"), but the canonical workflow is abstract ("Define API/data contracts. Decompose tasks...") and the actual plan JSON shape or example task is never shown — it is deferred to resources/task-template.json, which is not present in the bundle, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced flow (Entry, PREPARE/REASON/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE, Exit) with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint ("Check task atomicity, acceptance criteria, security/testing coverage, and dependency shape") and a failure-and-recovery feedback section; verification is stated at a high level but not operationalized as a concrete checklist, matching the 'most checkpoints present' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep and each is labeled with its purpose, but none of the referenced files (resources/execution-protocol.md, resources/task-template.json, ../_shared/core/*) exist in the bundle, and the References section is structurally broken by a stray prose line ("Save plan to `.agents/results/...`") interrupting the bullet list mid-section, so organization is imperfect rather than merely having minor gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |