Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable planning skill with a clear scene-based workflow and explicit verification and recovery steps. Its weak points are token-efficiency (a duplicated reference section and an abstract SSL-primitive action table) rather than correctness or organization.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the References section: keep the bulleted path list and remove the repeated prose lines (lines 140-145) that restate the same resources/execution-protocol.md, examples.md, and iso-planning.md paths.
Replace or drop the "SSL primitive" (READ/SELECT/INFER/VALIDATE/WRITE/NOTIFY) Actions table, which reads as non-executable jargon; the evidence column already conveys the same meaning without the abstraction layer.
Make the VERIFY scene's validation concrete by naming the actual check (e.g., the task-template.json schema fields to validate against) instead of only describing the validation conceptually, which would lift workflow_clarity to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely tight and table-driven without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the References section lists paths twice (prose then bullets, lines 140-159) and the SSL-primitive "Actions" table adds jargon that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present via the YAML output schema, canonical file paths (plan-{sessionId}.json, result-pm.md), and specific guardrail fields, but the READ/SELECT/INFER "SSL primitive" action layer is abstract non-executable jargon rather than real operations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear PREPARE→REASON→ACT→VERIFY→FINALIZE sequence with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint and failure/recovery feedback loops is present; the VERIFY step is described as checks rather than a concrete validation command, keeping it just short of a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points one level deep to clearly signaled reference files, with no inline bulk content that belongs elsewhere; minor gaps come from the duplicated reference list and cross-skill paths (../_shared/, ../oma-orchestration/) that cannot be verified against a bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |