Conciseness

The body is dense and procedural with tight tables and concrete commands, but guardrails 10/10a/10b carry philosophical rationale ('compounds into over-verification', 'narrows the model's exploration space') that could be trimmed.

Actionability

Provides concrete, runnable commands (oma skills lint --skill {name}, git diff --check, rg/find/awk/sed) and a numbered canonical workflow with exact steps and an explicit fallback; minor gaps remain in a few high-level transitions.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced Entry -> Scenes (PREPARE/ACQUIRE/REASON/ACT/VERIFY/FINALIZE) -> Transitions -> Failure-and-recovery table -> Exit, with an explicit VERIFY validation step and feedback loops for error recovery.

Progressive Disclosure

References are one-level-deep and gathered in a References section with appropriate conceptual offloading to resources/, but no bundle files actually exist in the skill directory and one shared reference is buried mid-guardrail rather than only in References.

Specificity

Names the OMA skill domain and lists several concrete actions (create, update, convert, validate), though the verbs stay somewhat generic; minor coverage gaps keep it just below comprehensive.

Completeness

Explicitly states both the 'what' ('Create or update OMA skills in the SSL-lite human-readable format') and the 'when' via a concrete 'Use when...' clause with three distinct trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural, user-sayable triggers like 'adding a new .agents/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md', 'converting an existing skill', and 'validating whether a skill has enough routing, execution, resource, and safety detail', with good but not exhaustive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A narrow, well-defined niche (OMA SSL-lite skill authoring) anchored by a specific file path trigger and a named structural format, leaving minimal overlap risk with adjacent skills.