The body is dense and largely command/guardrail-oriented (tokens that earn their place), but the same resources are listed twice — once in Dependencies (lines 75-82) and again verbatim in References (lines 287-298) — and the canonical command path overlaps the Actions table, so it could be tightened. It is not level 1 because it avoids generic concept explanation and is mostly efficient; it is not level 3 because the redundancy and length exceed a lean, every-token-earns-its-place bar.

A full 'Canonical command path' gives copy-paste-ready executable bash (oma slide new/validate/viewer/bundle/pdf/png/pptx), with explicit env-var overrides and concrete artifact paths, matching level-3 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready.' It is not level 2 because the guidance is concrete and complete rather than pseudocode or abstract.

Phases 0-6 are explicitly sequenced (DETECT/DISCOVER/STYLE/GENERATE/VALIDATE/REVIEW/DELIVER) with an explicit validation feedback loop ('Max 3 iterations; surface diff to user on failure') and a Failure and recovery section, matching level-3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery.' It is not level 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit.

References are clearly signaled and one-level-deep (dedicated References + Dependencies sections pointing to resources/*.md and ../_shared/core/*), but the referenced bundle files do not exist in this bundle (no references/ directory) and the body inlines substantial detail (16 guardrails, the full CLI⇄Skill boundary table, the complete command path) that belongs in those referenced files. It is not level 3 because of the absent bundle files and inline-heavy structure; it is not level 1 because references are well-signaled rather than monolithic or deeply nested.

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Generates distinctive, animation-rich HTML decks at a fixed 1920×1080 stage', 'deterministically validates, bundles, and exports them to PDF/PNG/PPTX', 'Produces self-contained single-file HTML with keyboard/touch nav, speaker notes' — matching the level-3 anchor for multiple specific concrete actions. It is not level 2 because the action set is comprehensive and concrete rather than naming only a domain and a few actions.

Explicitly answers what ('HTML presentation deck generator and multi-format exporter... validates, bundles, and exports') and when ('Use for slide, deck, presentation... requests'), matching level-3 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers.' It is not level 2 because the trigger guidance is explicit ('Use for...') rather than only implied.

Natural user terms are well covered: 'slide, deck, presentation, slides, pptx, keynote' plus CJK variants '슬라이드, 발표자료, プレゼン, 幻灯片' — matching level-3 'good coverage of natural terms users would say.' It is not level 2 because it includes common variations rather than only some relevant keywords.

The fixed 1920×1080 stage, the `oma slide` CLI, and CJK trigger terms carve a clear niche unlikely to conflict with general document skills, matching level-3 'clear niche with distinct triggers.' It is not level 2 because the scope is narrowly bounded rather than overlapping with similar skills.