Conciseness

Telegraphic, dense writing with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section carries operational content. Minor redundancy keeps it below 5 — the mock-harness caveat is stated both in 'Structural Flow' ('OMA_VIDEO_MOCK=1 is a test harness only...') and Guardrail 6, and the dry-run caveat appears twice.

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases: all three modes ('oma video generate "Jeju coffee" --mode shorts --aspect 9:16 --captions tiktok --script ./script.json'), compose/render, doctor, and provider list. The JSON return envelope is spelled out ('{exitCode, runDir, manifestPath, ...}') and recovery names exact paths ('<runDir>/hyperframes/index.html') — matches the 5 anchor, not 4, since no key execution detail is missing.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (decide/confirm → generate → compose → author index.html → render) with explicit validation ('lints, renders, and ffprobes', 'positive ffprobe duration') and real feedback loops ('Fix a reported composition or toolchain failure and re-run'), plus a pre-delivery checklist reference. Falls short of 5 because the full ordered pipeline is deferred to resources/execution-protocol.md, leaving end-to-end ordering only implied by the command block.

Progressive Disclosure

Exemplary conditional-reference pattern: 'Load only what the task needs' followed by six purpose-conditioned, one-level-deep references. However, none of the referenced resources/ files exist in this bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), so the paths cannot be verified as real — a minor gap against the 5 anchor's well-signaled, verifiable references.

Specificity

Names the domain ('Create short, explainer, or recorded-demo videos through the OMA video CLI') and lists several capabilities (scripts, narration, assets, composition, video delivery), though the latter are nouns rather than concrete actions. Not 5 because the capability list is component-shaped rather than a comprehensive set of specific actions.

Completeness

Both parts are present: what ('Create short, explainer, or recorded-demo videos through the OMA video CLI') and when ('Use for scripts, narration, assets, composition, and video delivery'). The 'when' is a component list rather than explicit user-situation triggers, so it matches 'has both what and when; when could be more explicit or specific' rather than the 5 anchor's concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('short', 'explainer', 'demo', 'videos', 'narration'), but misses common variations like 'reel', 'walkthrough', 'screen recording', 'clip', or '.mp4'. Good coverage with a few natural terms missing — matches the 4 anchor, not 3 (well beyond generic keywords) and not 5 (no synonyms or extensions).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Videos through the OMA video CLI' carves a clear niche distinct from sibling image/slide/voice skills, in correct third-person voice. Minor overlap risk remains with generic video-editing requests that the body (but not the description) excludes, so it falls just short of the clear-niche 5 anchor.