CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fla-mr-readiness

Checklist and workflow for preparing an MR/PR in the FLA repo. Covers CONTRIBUTING.md compliance, test plan, benchmark evidence, and PR body structure.

63

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/fla-mr-readiness/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

FLA MR Readiness Skill

Use this skill before opening a pull request to make sure the change is well-scoped, well-tested, and well-documented.

Pre-flight checklist

  1. Read CONTRIBUTING.md

    • Confirm code style, docstring format, commit message conventions.
    • Make sure your branch is up to date with main (or the target branch).
  2. Confirm change scope

    • List the files you modified.
    • If the change spans multiple layers (kernel + model + benchmark script), note the dependency chain in the PR description.
  3. Check for duplicate work

    • Search open issues and PRs:
      gh pr list --repo fla-org/flash-linear-attention --state open --search "<keywords>"
    • If a related PR exists, comment on it rather than opening a competing one.
  4. Run dependent tests

    • Find tests affected by your change:
      python scripts/find_dependent_tests.py <changed_file_or_dir>
    • Run those tests locally and ensure they pass.
    • If a test is flaky, retry once; if it still fails, explain why in the PR.
  5. Performance evidence (if touching kernel code)

    • See fla-nvidia-performance skill for the full evidence requirements.
    • At minimum: before/after benchmark on the same hardware, dense + varlen workloads if applicable, and a summary of any NCU profiling you did.
  6. Write PR summary

    • Use the CI-enforced structure below. The source of truth is .github/pull_request_template.md; the check-pr-title workflow rejects bodies that drop the checklist, so never trim it to save space.
  7. Code style review

    • Follow CONTRIBUTING.md for Python style, docstrings, comments, and commit prefixes.
    • In tests and public code, use device/platform wrappers from fla.utils (device, device_platform, IS_NVIDIA, IS_NVIDIA_HOPPER, IS_NVIDIA_BLACKWELL, IS_AMD, IS_INTEL) instead of new direct torch.cuda platform checks. Add a small fla.utils helper first when the existing wrappers are not enough.
    • Keep NVIDIA-only profiling commands in performance docs or scripts, not in generic correctness tests.

PR body structure

Follow .github/pull_request_template.md exactly, checklist included:

## Summary
One-paragraph description of what changed and why.

## Test plan
- Unit tests added/modified: `<list>`
- Dependent tests run: `<list>`
- Varlen / CP / model tests: `<yes/no + details>`

## Benchmark / NCU (kernel changes only)
- Hardware: `<e.g., H100>`
- Workload: `<batch, seq_len, dtype>`
- Before: `<throughput or latency>`
- After: `<throughput or latency>`
- Conclusion: `<improvement / neutral / trade-off>`
  (state "neutral" when the change is not performance-related)

## Breaking changes
- None / list any API or behavior changes.

## Checklist

- [x] I have read [CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and follow its conventions (code style, docstrings, commit prefixes).
- [x] I have read [AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md) and, where my change matches its scope, the relevant skill under [.agents/skills](../.agents/skills).
- [x] Dependent tests pass locally or in CI, and new behavior is covered by tests where applicable (tick as N/A for changes with no testable code, e.g. docs-only).
- [x] Kernel changes include same-hardware before/after benchmark numbers, dense + varlen where applicable (tick as N/A when no kernel code changed).
- [ ] This PR is minor/cosmetic-only (typo, formatting, style-only tweaks) — tick only if it is, and justify below.

### If you ticked the "minor" box above

<justification — required when the "minor" box is ticked; otherwise delete this section>

What check-pr-title (.github/workflows/check-pr-title.yml) enforces:

  • The first four checklist boxes must always be ticked; each item carries its own N/A reading, so a tick means "considered — done or not applicable" (e.g. benchmark numbers on a docs-only PR).
  • The "minor" box is the inverse: leave it unticked for normal PRs. Tick it only when the PR genuinely is a typo/formatting/style-only tweak — then a justification of at least a sentence (≥ 20 non-whitespace characters, HTML comments stripped) under ### If you ticked is required.
  • Editing the body re-triggers the check. To edit a PR title/body on this repo, use the REST API, not gh pr edit (see AGENTS.md "Opening PRs").

Important reminders

  • Do not put raw performance numbers without context. Always include:

    • workload shape (batch, seq_len, heads, dims, dtype)
    • hardware model
    • benchmark command used
    • before vs after
    • your conclusion
  • Do not commit .ncu-rep files or raw profile dumps. Summarize results in the PR body and keep artifacts local.

  • No busywork PRs: bundle trivial cleanups into a substantive change; do not open a PR for a single typo unless it is part of a larger fix.

Repository
fla-org/flash-linear-attention
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.