Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with strong validation and feedback loops, but it is verbose with restated constraints and references a known_consumers.md file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Create resources/known_consumers.md (or remove the two links to it) so the referenced consumer list actually resolves.
Consolidate the 'do not commit downstream changes' constraint into one stated location instead of repeating it across the IMPORTANT block, Pathway B, and the cleanup section.
Tighten prose asides such as the 'Discovering Local Checkouts' sub-steps and the redundant restatements of transient-edit handling to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operational but padded — the 'No Downstream Commits Allowed' constraint is restated three times (IMPORTANT block, Pathway B constraint, cleanup note) and several asides could be tightened, so it does not meet 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands appear throughout — 'git status', 'dart test', 'flutter pub get', 'dart analyze --fatal-infos <path>', 'dart format .' — plus a copy-paste pubspec.yaml ref example, giving specific actionable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-section sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('verify all existing tests pass', 'dart analyze --fatal-infos', re-run migrated suite) and a feedback loop in Section 3 (failure -> diagnose -> human decision -> Pathway A/B) for a risky operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body links to resources/known_consumers.md twice and that file (and resources/ directory) does not exist, so the navigation is broken and all content sits inline in one file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |