CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

flutter-add-widget-test

Implement a component-level test using `WidgetTester` to verify UI rendering and user interactions (tapping, scrolling, entering text). Use when validating that a specific widget displays correct data and responds to events as expected.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/flutter-add-widget-test/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body with executable Dart examples, a sequenced workflow checklist, and a feedback loop. It is concise and navigation-friendly, with only minor room to tighten intro sentences and consider splitting the large example.

Suggestions

Trim redundant intro sentences like 'Ensure the testing environment is properly configured before authoring widget tests.' for a leaner body.

Consider moving the full target-widget source into a reference file so SKILL.md stays a tighter overview, keeping progressive disclosure one level deep.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's knowledge of Flutter/widget tests, with only minor over-explanation such as 'Ensure the testing environment is properly configured before authoring widget tests.' that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Dart code (testWidgets, pumpWidget, tap, enterText, drag, pumpAndSettle) and a complete worked example covering add/tap/drag/dismiss that spans the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 9-step checklist with explicit verification (steps 4 and 7) and a feedback loop (step 9: review output, fix, re-run), though intermediate validation is somewhat implicit rather than gated.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained and well-organized with a table of contents and clear sections; no bundle files exist, and the ~90-line inline widget+test example is reasonable but could optionally be split into a reference file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-structured description that covers both capabilities and an explicit use-when trigger, anchored in concrete Flutter widget-testing actions. It is strong but stops short of the comprehensive trigger-phrase coverage and exhaustive action list needed for a top score.

Suggestions

Add a couple of common natural trigger phrases (e.g., 'Flutter widget test', 'golden-file test') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Expand the action list slightly (e.g., golden-file matching, accessibility checks) to push specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('verify UI rendering', 'user interactions (tapping, scrolling, entering text)') via WidgetTester, but coverage is not exhaustive (e.g., no mention of golden-file or accessibility testing).

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states both what the skill does (implement component-level tests with WidgetTester) and when to use it ('Use when validating that a specific widget displays correct data and responds to events as expected'), with the 'when' slightly general rather than enumeration of triggers.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ('component-level test', 'UI rendering', 'tapping, scrolling, entering text'), though common variations like 'Flutter widget test' or 'golden test' are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The widget-testing niche with WidgetTester is mostly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against broader integration-test skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
flutter/agent-plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.